Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Popular Discussions - SAP ERP PLM - Classification and Variant Configuration
Viewing all 692 articles
Browse latest View live
↧

Multilevel characteristic data flow in variant configuration

January 24, 2012, 3:18 am
$
0
0

Hi all,

 

I do have scenario as below.

 

i have three level bom. first two level are configured items.

 

level1 : chainpully : a variant material with characteristic 1. Length, 2. height and 3. capacity

level 2 : gearbox and channel : gearbox is variant and it has characteristics as 1. Capacity

level 3: shaft : in BOM of gear box three shafts will be there and will be picked based on dependency.

 

BOM is

 

chainpully----->gearbox--

> shaft

 

now the requirement is if i select length, height and capacity in level 1 order then it should update characteristic of gearbox (i. e. level 2 as same in header) for that order and the same to third level.

 

 

Can anyone help in this?

↧
Search

CONFIGUARION_PROCESS_DATA error in sales order and variant configuration

December 19, 2012, 7:31 am
$
0
0

Hello,

 

We have to create variant material while creation of sales order. i.e. user creates sales order, in that he will give configurable material as item and he hits it will leads to variant material creation. Once user enters the characteristics and check whether the material is exists or not. He press BACK and If variant material is not available , we did custom code to create material and executes all CS40.CA01,CK11N and CK24 transactions.

Here we were able to do all above said process but once the pop up comes with newly created variant material, and we are selecting that. Here we are getting the below error.

 

"Internal error in communication between configuration and sales doc. CONFIGURATION_PROCESS_DATA".

here CUOBJ created is not mating with internal CUOBJ i.e. 9999999999990001".

 

Please suggest are we missing any thing.

 

Sreedhara

↧
↧

Variant Configuration with BRF+

August 3, 2015, 11:00 pm
$
0
0

Hello All,

 

I am looking for some information on Variant configuration using BRF+ for high level configuration.

 

Can someone share with some document or link...?

 

Best Regards,

Ravi

↧

No New Batch creation

December 2, 2015, 10:40 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

We have batch managed materials with characteristics value. Whenever i am receiving a material through MIGO, i am updating the characteristics ( For eg Viscosity : 20 ) for which a batch number is getting created automatically.

 

When i am doing a second GR with a different characteristics value ( Viscosity : 80 ) a new batch is getting created.

 

At this outset, we need a functionality wherein a third GR received with Viscosity : 20 should not create a new batch. The system should prompt us a message the characteristics value already entered had a batch already posted in to your system. Do you still need to create a new batch ?

 

Do we have any configurations to achieve this functionality. Please expedite.

 

Regards,

Dilli

↧

LSMW characteristics CHRMAS01

April 9, 2015, 8:52 am
$
0
0

Hi,

 

I tried to upload characteristics into SAP by using LSMW CHRMAS01 without sucess. I don't understant, when I process IDOC I get the message below:

 

Error during IDOC processing. see log for details

 

I don't know why I get this message.

 

 

anybody could help me

 

 

Thanks a lot

 

 

Corentin

 

2015-04-09_18-46-05.png

 

2015-04-09_18-47-21.png

2015-04-09_18-50-41.png

2015-04-09_18-51-06.png

↧
↧

Component Effectivity Date from CU51 to CS63

September 17, 2015, 5:21 am
$
0
0

In CU51, the opening screen has the option to enter an ECM or a date for the effectivity of a change.  It defaults to today's date.  For this example, we are using today's date, not an ECM.  My expectation is that if I delete component A and add component B using CU51, when I look at CS63 that component and that component alone will have the effectivity date of today.  If it were a phantom, I would expect its components to have today's date as well.

 

Our engineer used CU51 to change a component.  When we look at CS63, numerous unrelated components also show today's date as the effective date and have his user id as the person who changed them.  In particular, a major assembly unrelated to his change had it's effectivity date changed.  This causes problems because the effectivity date can determine whether or not an item is included as a component in a planned order.

 

Can anyone explain how the effectivity date is changed while using CU51?  What is the expected behavior?

↧

Configurable Material Pricing

September 5, 2015, 11:21 pm
$
0
0

Dears,

 

I have a requirement where i need to make a pricing condition specified for each characteristic, How can I achieve this requirement ? or i have to use only SDCOM and VKOND.

↧

Reg: Understanding basics on variant table

November 8, 2014, 8:45 am
$
0
0

Dear Experts ,

 

Could you please guide me to understand how to use variant table..?

 

How to maintain  with simple example .

 

 

Regards,

Daya

↧
Search

Appending new characteristic in existing class (class type 300)

June 11, 2015, 10:37 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

We have created multiple classes with various characteristics assigned to it. Now, we have a requirement to add new characteristics to all classes.

 

Can you please suggest a way to update this new characteristic to multiple classes. We have tried LSMW Idoc method but it expects to delete all existing characteristics within the class and add new set of characteristics which is not possible.

 

Thanks & Regards,

Manohar

↧
↧

CU50 Configuration: Characteristic Value Assignment & Inconsistencies

July 10, 2015, 7:47 am
$
0
0


Hello Gurus,

I am using CU50 to test my configured material profile.  There are many 'entry required' characteristics, some depending on a value selection of another. 

 

When testing, I like to go directly to the yellow light under 'Status' and double-click for a list of inconsistencies/entry required chars that are not yet set with a value. 

     There may be 5 characteristics that need a value, but if I select the second(2nd) characteristic that pops-up, the remaining four(4) will get populated through table constraints and/or more entry required chars will become inconsistent. Therefore, I want the second(2nd) characteristic to show first(1st).

 

The question is: When double-clicking the yellow/inconsistency button, what determines the (sorting) order in which the inconsistent characteristics are displayed?  Can I control this somehow?

 

Thanks, in advance, for any help/tips!

 

- Jen

↧

Pop Up of Characteristic During sales order creation

July 30, 2015, 9:59 pm
$
0
0

Hi,

 

In normal sceanrio we are getting screen interface for the characteristic in sales order.

 

But my requirement is while sales order creation system while give pop - up for specific characterstic in specified sequence.

 

Please let me know how to configure this.

 

Warm Regards,

Ajay Rana

↧

Transaction CLMM: Error - The Target Class is not assigned to Initial Class

October 28, 2015, 1:33 am
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

I am trying upload mass characteristic values for some materials using Transaction CLMM.

 

Set and Change values has been completed and when I try to use - Assign Values in Matrix, Target Objects have been given as the material for which the values need to be assigned, system shows the error message: The Target Class is not assigned to Initial Class.

 

Can anyone explain the reason behind this error. We are getting the issue only for two materials. For other materials we are able to upload data

 

Also is there any requirement that CLMM will only work when you already have another class attached to a material.

 

Please revert on the above.

 

Thanks in advance.

 

Regards,

 

R Vijayakumar


↧

Assign interval multiple value into characteristic

December 4, 2015, 10:55 pm
$
0
0

Dear Guru,

 

hello, i'm new on Variant Configuration and need your input.

I have dependency characteristic and I want to assign multiple value as a precondition. In the editor I wrote below syntax :

     $set_default($self, tpreast, in(6 - 11))

I want to put multiple value to characteristic tpreast from 6 to 11. but the above syntax generated error message :

     Reference to object $root, $parent, or $self required

Please let me know the correct syntax for above requirement. Appreciate your help.

 

Thank you,

Budi

↧
↧

Variant configuration

July 25, 2014, 5:20 pm
$
0
0

Hi SAP Guru's,

 

We have variant configured at the client place. My requirement is related to copying from Sales order ZOR to Sales order ZTA document.

 

When I copy from ZOR to ZTA , variant configuration characteristics and values get copied to ZTA. These characteristics are in Display mode, ie I cannot edit / Change these values.

 

Here business wants these Characteristics to be editable in ZTA Sales order document.

 

How do I achieve this requirement?

 

Please advise.

 

Thanks

 

Nidhish.

↧

Variant Configuration Performance (Note 917987)

June 15, 2015, 10:32 am
$
0
0

Hi Experts,

 

Currently our implementation is suffering from performance issues within VC (roughly 2 minutes to open configuration and 20-30 seconds between clicks). I have taken a look at Note 917987 and was hoping some questions could be answered.

 

(8) Characteristics with many values (B4)

"Many" is fairly relative, is there a range that would be considered many in regards to characteristic values? Does this also effect table driven characteristics?

 

(10) Linking variant tables to database tables

The note says tables that are 10,000 rows by 10 columns should be linked to DB tables. I have tables in the 15,000 rows x 5 columns, are we approaching the point of linking them? What would the communities suggestion be in this regard?


(12) Large number of variant tables

We currently have around one thousand variant tables in the system with any given model using between 90 and 160 different variant tables. Is this too much? It would be difficult for us to cut this back based on business requirements, but if it would drastically help, we would have to figure something out.



Your help would be greatly appreciated.

↧
Search

Variant configuration - Single dependency for all components

August 31, 2015, 2:21 am
$
0
0

Hi...

 

I have super BOM which contains all the components and based on one characteristic value, Bom components are varying.. In this case we need to create an Object dependency for each component in the Super Bom. My requirement is I want to create a single OD which will be assigned to the all components of the Bomthat can call the Reference characteristic from table.

 

Char valuecomponent
A100001
B100002
C100003
↧

SAP ECC 6.0 to EHP 6 UPGRADE EFFECT ON SD VC

December 19, 2013, 4:16 am
$
0
0

Hello Expert,

 

We are upgrading ECC 6.0 to ECC 6.0 EHP 6 ,I would like to know the effect on SD VC master data like class, procedure ,user interface design,dependencies,characteristics ,change number master and VC configuration etc.

 

We have approximate 1800 characteristics with more than 200 dependencies  with thousands line of code in procedure,preselection, selection,constraint,variant table,variant function  and some enhancement in function module etc. Its huge data so I am worried if anything goes wrong then it will be big mess.

 

Please suggest for better execution of new EHP 6.

 

Regards,

Vipin

↧
↧

Issue in UOM for material while synchonising recipe to BOM

December 6, 2015, 10:09 pm
$
0
0

Hi All,

 

I am facing an issue when synchronizing the material to BOM.

 

When synchronizing Recipe to BOM, BOM component is updated as per base unit of measure even though alternate UOM is maintained in recipe.

We have maintained alternate UOM in material master but when synchronizing recipe to BOM the UOM in the BOM changes to Base UOM.

 

When liquid material can be measured in both liters and KGS. If liters in Base UOM, when synchronizing recipe to BOM the UOM is getting updated as Liters even when alternate UOM is maintained in both Material master and Recipe.

 

Regards,

GVK

↧

Pricing in Variant Configuration

August 2, 2006, 11:29 pm
$
0
0

I am a beginner in SAP. I am currently involved in Product modeling using Variant Configuration.Now, i need to do Pricing using Variant Configuration. Can anybody guide me in this regard.

I want to know How Pricing for a model is done(implemented) using Variant Configuration?

↧

Higher number of assignments (ANZUO) for table KLAH

September 2, 2015, 7:38 am
$
0
0

Dear Experts,

 

Need your suggestion about one requirement.

It is about table KLAH and field ' No. of assgmts'.

Field name = ANZUO . Data element = ANZUOR.

 

This field is of type numeric with length = 5.

 

which means, in table KLAH, maximum of 99999.

 

Actually, in our client's business, few classes having more than 99999 objects.

Thus, those classes are not being selected to view in table KLAH as the value of the field ANZUO is more than 99999.

 

Is there any way to increase the max value of this field ANZUO (Number of assignment) of table KLAH? May be upto 6 or 7 numeric value?

This is the requirement.

Any SAP Note related to this !

 

Thanks in advance for your kind advices.

 

Regards,

Supriyo

↧
Viewing all 692 articles
Browse latest View live
Search
<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>