Dears,
Please i need to Create a the following Structure
Configurable Material (With Variants) -- Level 1
Configurable Material (With Variants) -- Level 2
Configurable Material (With Variants) -- Level 3
Raw Materials ( Selected using VC) -- Level 4
is this structure applicable in SAP ? or not ?
BR,
Salah
Hi masters,
A costumer have created a new activity type, using SAP_03 as a model, and associated it to work centers/routing.
When we create a Production Order, the standard value into the operations of the PO of this new activity type is not getting the VC value.
The routing value is showed and not the VC value.
However, the old activity still fine (VC Table Value).
I have checked the master data (Classes, VC Tables, etc) and I do not found a way to get it fixed.
Please advise.
Best regards
Hello Friends
I have a requirement and need your help .In my current project based on some conditions i need to grey out configuration screen in VA01
Example
1)If condition "XYZ'" has been met ,in VA01 user should get configuration editor as greyed out
2)If condition XYZ has not been met ,in VA01 user should be able edit configuration screen
Along with the ABAP consultant ,we have searched for user exit /BADI/ but no success
Could you guys kindly help us in this matter .Is there a way we can fulfill the requirement through ABAP
Thanks and Regards
Sunil Srinivasan
Dear Team,
I am configuring the VC in SAP.
I have KMAT material CAR. For CAR header material I am creating the super BOM. In super BOM I have two items namely as below.
Item 0010 - Power Steering
Item 0020 - Normal Steering
I would like to restrict that the user SHOULD NOT SELECT BOTH ITEMS (power steering as well as normal steering). If anyone of the line item in the BOM is selected, the other line item should disappear for selection. How we can achieve this using VC?
Thanks
Hi,
As per the example given in http://scn.sap.com/docs/DOC-25224 I configured computer.
The Issue is BOM is not exploded in sales order. Price also not determined. I followed exactly whatever mentioned in the example.
I am not quite sure where to start looking into this issue.
Can you help me where to start?
Thanks
Siri
Hi,
We're on SAP ERP 6.0 EHP7. I have implemented similar solution, that is, to use check fm instead of check table.
My *_F4 fm for the characteristic works on GUI side:
However, it errors on WebUI side for the same characteristic:
Have you encountered or are you aware of this issue? Any help on how to resolve this?
Thanks in advance.
We have a Characteristic YYMATNR defined with reference to MARA-YYMATNR and we would like to have the characteristic value both in table MARA and AUSP. We are aware of report RCCLAPRE to populate AUSP once ”Redundant Storage” is made available for MARA.
In transaction O1CL, we would like to set parameter ”Redundant Storage” for Object Table MARA exactly as defined by SAP AG for table KKRAMERK.
None of the Class Types associated with KKRAMERK has “Multiple Objects Allowed”:
The same parameter ”Redundant Storage” is again available 1 node down, but if we were to set it here for combination Class Type-Table 001-MARA then we would need this other setting “Multiple Object Allowed”. However such setting has serious side-effects that we would like to avoid.
Meaning ideally we should have “Redundant Storage” without this “Multiple Object Allowed”. Any ideas?
-------------------
Best Regards
Daniel
Is there any document for learning constraints in VC. Which website i can refer for constraints program for VC?
Hi Experts
I have created a characteristic, which is being used in a Variant class.
This characteristic is used to show selected product option prices (Currency format) in VC.
Format defined as 6 chars and 2 decimal places. (template is selected automatically)
It all worked fine, since the prices were under 10000 CHF...4 figures, eg. 9999.
But now the prices have changed and and gone up to 5 figures.. eg. 11000 which also need to appear in VC.
Since the characteristic is defined with 6 chars, when i try to add the new prices, i encounter an error:
Since there are Materials which have already been configured using this Characteristic.. i am not able to change the format.
Does anyone know what can be done in this case so that the characteristic allows 5 digit values?
Thanks & regards,
Shashank
P.S: I have already tried locking all the Dependencies and Variant tables in which this characteristic has been used. But i still cannot change the format.
Hi,
I am very new to VC and my client has a quite simple requirement. They have a urea product in various bag size and the quantity of the BOM is depend on the bag size selection in the sales order. Say when customer select 25kg bag then BOM quantity for Urea will be 26.2 kg, when customer select 50 kg bag then BOM quantity for Urea will be 50.7 kg, etc.
I have created characteristics for bag size, component quantity and reference BOM qty (STPO-MENGE) characteristics. Component quantity is a simple reading table from VC, system determines the correct component, however when I did the simulation system gives me in the wrong format.
Example :
When I select 50kg bag, the component quantity is 50.7kg, but when I displayed the result it becomes 0.507 in the BOM component. Its the same when I select 25kg bag, the component quantity is 26.2kg, but when I displayed the result it becomes 0.262 in the BOM component. It looks like always divided by 100. When I double click the line item it gives me 0.010 in the BOM quantity.
I have checked both characteristics and both of them have the same attributes.
Please see my attached file for more detail and the object dependency syntax.
Thank you
Rgds,
Hendrik
Hi,
We have been using CU50 for calculating our multi-level configurable products (each sub-level assembly is a dummy material).
Normally the configutation values are available at product variant on MRP3 view. The calculation determines the variants based on this.
Everything goes well until a sublevel assembly has a fix variant at its MRP3 view. Then the subassembly BOM doesn't explode if there is a material variant. As configurable material can not be removed, the problem is not solvable by correcting master data.
Is there any idea, why a configurable material on MRP3 view would become a problem for CU50 calculation
This is how it look likes on Costing1
Here is the log about the material with error message. However the item has a valid super BOM.
If there wasn't any variant on MRP3, the costing run could run without any error.
Kind regards
Cihan
Hi,
While exploding the BOM for a line item in sales order we are getting the error: Configuration not possible for material 'XX' Reason 3-> help. Msg No. V1360
I have checked the configuration profile it is already maintained.
The order does holds the plant,the order quantity is greater then '0'.
The material is marked as configurable.
What could be the reason?
Regards,
Ali
Hi
Does anyone know if it is possible to add the total duration of all operations on a maintenance order on the Header data screen?
FornowI can only see the duration ofthe firsy operation.
Thank you
Ruark
Hi,
Is it possible to get the report of active quotes where particular characteristic is being used ( based on the answer/value). I am not passing the value for this char to SD via SDCOMM. Table AUSP is blank for this question. Ex. the question is "Color of the car" and the choices are Blue and yellow. I am not passing this value to SD at all. But I wanted to retrieve the quotes that are using this question where the answer was "yellow".
Thanks,
DMK
Dear Friends,
In Invariant configuration t.code CU50 while click on result button all the BOM is display . It has to display only variant BOM which i selected one. Kindly do the needful.pl find the screen shot.
Regards,
Sabhapathy R
Hello Guys,
Is there any standard report OR way to create report for the line item wise VC inconsistent sales order report.
Hi Experts,
I have created a characteristic 'Department' and when I assign the table 'T527O' in the Value tab it gives an error " Check table T527O has too many key fields".
In the error it says that "Check tables with more than one key field are not supported. However,
if you enter a function module for checking values, you can refer to any check table in your own coding."
I am able to see one radio button called "Function Module" when I click on Other Value Check on Value tab, but do not know how to use that.
Could anyone please guide me in this.
My requirement is:
1. create a characteristic called department.
2. link it to a class,
3. while creating a document in CV01N the f4 help should be available in department field.
Thanks & Regards
Rajiv Roshan
Dear Gurus,
Before posting this thread, we have referred many SDN threads, OSS notes and other sites for any sort of help..but no success..All threads and other referrals are not much of help as they are kind of incomplete( Perhaps, we are unable to understand them..no offense).
Few checked threads on this subjects are:
http://scn.sap.com/thread/34590
http://scn.sap.com/thread/851070
http://scn.sap.com/thread/120144
OSS: 549563
Well, we're using the BAPI (BAPI_SALESORDER_CREATEFROMDAT2) which creates the sales order successfully but without the characteristic values in line items.
We're passing data to the following parameters - ORDER_CFGS_REF, ORDER_CFGS_INST, ORDER_CFGS_VALUE to create the variant config but not able to see it getting created.
Pls find attached BAPI coding document for your reference.
If you could throw any light on this issue will be of great help for us.
Thank You in Advance!!!
Reg,
Jagan-SD.
Dear Team,
I have done the setting for SAP VC. And I am doing the simulation in CU50 with the option "Sales / Distribution" as below. With "Sales / Distribution" option I could see the configuration simulation results. But in the initial screen, if I choose the option 'Engineering", I could NOT see the configuration simulation results & getting below error. How to solve this error?
Cu50 error:
No configuration profile selected for the configurable object ZZZZ (KMAT Material Number)
Message No: CX005
Thanks
Hello All,
I have two characteristics. Please see my scenario below and request your inputs on this.
As soon as a material number is entered in the configurator, the other characteristic should get the description of that material from the table. Please let me know if this can be achieved through a reference characteristic.
Thanks & Regards,
Adithya